Preview

Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)

Advanced search

Comparison of the results of treatment of acute paraproctitis in a specialized short-stay hospital and a general surgical hospital

https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2026-019

Abstract

Introduction. Acute paraproctitis (AP) is one of the most common diseases in emergency coloproctology that require emergency surgical treatment.

Аim. To conduct а comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of patients with AP in a specialized short-stay hospital (SSSH) and a general surgical department.

Materials and methods. A comparative prospective-retrospective non-randomized clinical study was conducted. The results of surgical treatment of 226 patients with AP were analyzed. In 118 patients (Group I), AP treatment was performed in the conditions of the SSSH (IMC "URO-PRO", Krasnodar), and in 108 patients (Group II) – in the conditions of a general surgical hospital in the system of municipal budgetary healthcare of the Krasnodar Territory. In patients of Group I, a transrectal ultrasound examination of the rectum and/or a magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis were performed during the examination, and an intraoperative verification of the fistula was performed, and after the abscess was opened, an elastic theloose seton was placed through the surgical wound. In patients of Group II, only a routine clinical examination was performed, and the surgical treatment of AP waslimited to the opening and traditional drainage of the purulent cavity.

Results. In Group I, the average hospital stay was 12.89 ± 5.7 hours, while in Group II, it was 4.2 ± 1.56 days. In Group I, 6 (5.08%) patients developed postoperative complications, while in Group II, 14 (12.96%) patients experienced complications. In Group II, 19 (17.59%) patients had a recurrence of the disease, while no recurrence was observed in Group I patients, which was directly related to the formation of a controlled consolidated fistula along the drainageligature.

Conclusions. Surgical treatment of patients with AP in the conditions of the SSSH, in comparison with the general surgical department, allows to reduce the number of postoperative complications by 7.88% (p = 0.022), and also to exclude the risk of developing a disease relapse.

About the Authors

B. M. Belik
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Boris M. Belik, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of General Surgery

29, Nakhichevan Lane, Rostov-on-Don, 344022



A. N. Kovalev
Rostov State Medical University; International Medical Center “URO-PRO”
Russian Federation

Aleksei N. Kovalev, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant of the Department of General Surgery, Rostov State Medical University; Coloproctologist-Surgeon, International Medical Center “URO-PRO”

29, Nakhichevan Lane, Rostov-on-Don, 344022,

108, 40 years of Victory St., Krasnodar, 350901



A. A. Orekhov
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Alexey A. Orekhov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Head of the Department of General Surgery

29, Nakhichevan Lane, Rostov-on-Don, 344022



References

1. Shelygin YuA, Achkasov SI, Akselrov MA, Aliev FS, Amirova AK, Groshilin VS et al. Clinical guidelines. Perianal abscess (K61, K61.0, K61.1, K61.2, K61.3, K61.4), adults, children. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(1):10–19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-1-10-19.

2. Ladinsky A, Smiley A, Latifi R. Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(7):5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075387.

3. Guner Ozenen G, Akaslan Kara A, Ozer A, Kacar P, Ergun D, Aydin A et al. Perianal abscess in children: an evaluation of microbiological etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05556-1.

4. Madaminov AM, Likhomanov LV. Results of surgical treatment of acute paraproctitis using laser. Vestnik KRSU. 2024;24(1):34–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36979/1694-500X-2024-24-1-34-38.

5. Denisenko EV. Rectal Fistulas: Current State of the Problem, Directions of Surgical Treatment (Literature Review). Novosti Khirurgii. 2023;31(5):383–396. (In Russ.) Available at: https://surgery.by/details.php?&lang=ru&year=2023&issue=5&number=4#close.

6. Wright WF. Infectious diseases perspective of anorectal abscess andfistula-in-ano disease. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351(4):427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2015.11.012.

7. Tumanbaev AM, Zhumadylova NB, Sydykov UO. Practical significance of ultrasonic examination for the diagnosis of paraproctitis. Vestnik KRSU. 2023;23(5):88–93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36979/1694-500X-2023-23-5-88-93.

8. Gorbunov IN, Egorkin MA, Polikarpova SV, Zhiryakova AS, Bolkvadze EE, Dacieva PSh, Dadyrova AN. Microbiota and rational empirical antibacterial therapy of anorectal abscess. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(3):87–94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-87-94.

9. Chakarov D, Hadzhieva E, Kalchev Y, Hadzhiev D. Aerobic Microbiological Spectrum and Antibiotic Resistance in Children Operated for Anorectal Abscesses. J Clin Med. 2024;13(8):2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082414.

10. Chen CY, Cheng A, Huang SY, Sheng WH, Liu JH, Ko BS et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of perianal infections in adult patients with acute leukemia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e60624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060624.

11. Guner Ozenen G, Akaslan Kara A, Ozer A, Kacar P, Ergun D, Aydin A et al. Perianal abscess in children: an evaluation of microbiological etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05556-1.

12. Alabbad J, Abdul Raheem F, Alkhalifa F, Hassan Y, Al-Banoun A, Alfouzan W. Retrospective Clinical and Microbiologic Analysis of Patients with Anorectal Abscess. Surg Infect. 2019;20(1):31–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.144.

13. Hong J-C, Chen J-S, Jiang Z-J, Chen Z-C, Ruan N, Yao X-P. Microbiota in adult perianal abscess revealed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(4):e0347423. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03474-23.

14. Sergatsky KI, Nikolsky VI, Koveshnikova TM, Prostochenko OV, Gerasimov AV, Yumangulova R. Characteristics of pathogens and optimal antibacterial therapy in patients with acute paraproctitis. Fundamental Research. 2015;1(2):371–375. (In Russ.) Available at: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=36906.

15. Alabbad J, Abdul Raheem F, Alkhalifa F, Hassan Y, Al-Banoun A, Alfouzan W. Retrospective Clinical and Microbiologic Analysis of Patients with Anorectal Abscess. Surg Infect. 2019;20(1):31–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.144.

16. Bender F, Eckerth L, Fritzenwanker M, Liese J, Askevold I, Imirzalioglu C et al. Drug resistant bacteria in perianal abscesses are frequent and relevant. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19123-6.

17. Bolkvadze EE, Egorkin MA. Classification and treatment of complex forms of acute paraproctitis. Fifteen years of experience. Koloproktologia. 2012;(2):13−16. (In Russ.) Available at: https://akr-online.ru/magazine-proctology/archive/_2_2012.

18. Hadzhieva Е, Chakarov D, Hadzhiev D, Kalchev Y. Surgical Tactics and Treatment of Anorectal Abscesses in Adult Patients. Scr Scient Med. 2023;55(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.14748/ssm.v55i0.9252.

19. Alligood DM, Laurendeau MV, Perez EA, Huerta CT. Conservative versus operative management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in infants: a narrative review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026;11:26. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-25-73.

20. Sergatsky KI, Nikolsky VI. Results of Optimization of the Medical and Diagnostic Algorithm in Patients with Acute Paraproctitis of Anaerobic Etiology. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2019;178(3):39–42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2019-178-3-39-42.

21. Vasiliev SV, Gor IV, Nedozimovanii AI, Popov DE, Skuridin GM, Vasilieva ES. Loose set-on in the treatment of paraproctitis. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2021;18(2):98–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2021-18-2-98-104.

22. Belik BM, Kovalev AN. The use of a permanent silicone loop "Seton" as a preparatory stage for radical surgical treatment of transsphincteric and extrasphincteric rectal fistulas. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2018;(3):86–87. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mossj.ru/jour/article/view/214/214.

23. Gaertner WB, Burgess PL, Davids JS, Lightner AL, Shogan BD, Sun MY et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal Fistula. Dis Col Rect. 2022;65(8):964–985. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002473.

24. Gandhi ND, Alibo EO, Gipe JH. Anal Abscess and Fistula. Surg Clin North Am. 2026;106(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2025.08.012.

25. Sergatskiy KI, Nikol′skiy VI, Ivachev AS, Arapova OM, Biryukova YаV. Extended grading of complications in patients with acute paraproctitis. University Proceedings. Volga Region. Medical Sciences. 2022;(4):36–44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3032-2022-4-4.

26. Shtyrkova SV, Soboleva OA, Sabirov KR, Novikov VA, Ntanishyan KI, Parovichnikova EN. Diagnostics and treatment of complicated perianal abscess in patients with hematologic malignancies. Koloproktologia. 2024;23(1):117–128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-1-117-128.

27. Sarofim M, Ooi K. Reviewing perianal abscess management and recurrence: lessons from a trainee perspective. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(7-8):1781–1783. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17750.


Review

For citations:


Belik B.M., Kovalev A.N., Orekhov A.A. Comparison of the results of treatment of acute paraproctitis in a specialized short-stay hospital and a general surgical hospital. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia). 2026;23(1):210-223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2026-019

Views: 296

JATS XML

ISSN 2712-8741 (Print)
ISSN 2782-2591 (Online)