Experience in outpatient management of patients after hybrid interventions on the arteries of the lower extremities
https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2025-015
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, due to the unsatisfactory results of arterial reconstructions in severe atherosclerotic lesions of the lower leg arteries, the development of postoperative management methods for this patient population is relevant.
Aim. To develop a method for outpatient management of patients after distal hybrid reconstruction using the drug sulodexide.
Materials and methods. The prospective study included 12 people who underwent hybrid surgery for severe atherosclerotic lesions of the femoral and lower leg arteries. All patients underwent the installation of the Cellular Arterial port system (6.5F) intraoperatively after the completion of the main stage. The administration of drugs into and evaluation of the effectiveness of the administration of drugs into the reconstruction area were carried out on an outpatient basis. The first group (n = 6) received sulodexide (Tromboliks® Pro) into the port system, and the second (n = 6) received heparin. The follow-up period for patients was 90 days. The SPSS Statistics 17.0 program was used for statistical data processing.
Results. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the course of the early postoperative period before discharge in the study groups. In the late postoperative period, the average number of recurrences of critical ischemia (group 1 – 2.8 ± 0.8; group 2 – 3.9 ± 0.4, p < 0.05), thrombosis of the tibial arteries (group 1 – 1.8 ± 0.3; group 2 – 2.9 ± 0.2, p < 0.05), repeated operations (group 1 – 2.8 ± 0.2; 2 group – 3.9 ± 0.3 ml, p < 0.05), small amputations (group 1 – 1.9 ± 0.6; group 2 – 2.7 ± 0.7 ml, p < 0.05) of the limb were significantly higher in the control group. In addition, the described complications were observed in the study group from 14 to 21 days, while in the control group – from 30 to 90 days.
Discussion. The antithrombotic effect of heparin on the area of extensive postoperative atheromatosis had a short-term effect. At alater date, a persistent angioprotective effect of thrombolysis was noted, based on an increase in prostaglandin synthesis on 30–90 days after surgery.
Conclusion. The use of the port system with prophylactic courses of heparinization of the vascular reconstruction area with sulodexide in patients after distal hybrid reconstruction with severe atherosclerosis of the lower leg arteries has good clinical results, more pronounced on 30-90 days of the postoperative period.
About the Authors
A. G. VaganovRussian Federation
Aleksey G. Vaganov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Surgeon, Surgical Department No. 1,
2, Hospital Square, Moscow, 111020
M. R. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
Maxim R. Kuznetsov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director of the Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology,
8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow,119992
A. N. Kosenkov
Russian Federation
Aleхandr N. Kosenkov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery at the Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine Professor,
8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow,119992
D. A. Lisitskiy
Russian Federation
Dmitriy A. Lisitskiy, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon of Surgical Department No. 1,
2, Hospital Square, Moscow, 111020
References
1. Gavrilenko AV, Kochetkov VA, Kravchenko AA. Hybrid operations in chronic lower limb ischemia. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;63(5):413–418. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2021-63-5-437-442.
2. Gavrilenko AV, Kravchenko AA, Kotov AE, Kirichenko VV. Hybrid reconstructions in patients with lower limb chronic ischaemia and multilevel arterial lesions. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2018;24(3):183–188. (In Russ.) Available at: https://angiolsurgery.org/magazine/2018/3/25.htm.
3. Bokeria LA, Arakelyan VS, Papitashvili VG, Tsurtsumiya ShSh. Long-term results of proximal and distal reconstructions in patients with lower limb arteries diffuse lesion and diabetes mellitus. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2021;25(4):271–281. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2021-25-4-271-281.
4. Katelnitskiy II, Sasina EV, Polyak MI. Clinical results of angioplasty depending on the number of restore of crural arteries and blood flow in the arterial arch of the foot in patients with critical limb ischemia. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2017;(3):51–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-3-51-57.
5. Katelnitskiy II, Sasina EV, Polyak MI, Trandofilov AM. Comparative evaluation of the clinical results of transluminal balloon angioplasty depending on the recovery of crural arteries on the basis of “angiosomes” theory. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2017;12(3):19–23. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.pirogov-vestnik.ru/upload/uf/5ea/magazine_2017_3.pdf.
6. Belov YuV, Vinokurov IA. The concept of surgical treatment of critical limb ischemia. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2015;8(5):9–13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio2015859-13.
7. Kazakov YuI, Lukin IB, Velikov PG, Strakhov MA. The choice of reconstruction technique of infrainguinal arterial segment in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2014;7(6):42–48. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/kardiologiya-i-serdechno-sosudistaya-khirurgiya/2014/6/031996-6385201468.
8. Puzdryak PD, Shlomin VV, Bondarenko PD, Ivanov MA, Yurtaev EA, Didenko YuP et al. Comparison of the results of hybrid and open surgical treatment of multilevel arterial disease oflower extremities. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2019;12(3):227–234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201912031227.
9. Anisimov SV, Kozlov AV. Modern approaches in the treatment of occlusive restenosis of the arteries of the lower extremities. Case report. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention (Russian Federation). 2023;22(7S):3635. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3635.
10. Ovcharenko DV, Kaputin MYu. Technical aspects of subintimal angioplasty of the lower leg arteries. International Journal of Interventional Cardioangiology. 2009;(17):36–40. (In Russ.) Available at: http://ijic.ru/pdf/17R.pdf.
11. Platonov SA, Zavatsky VV, Zhigalo VN, Kiselev MA, Isaev KSh, Khomchuk IA et al. Primary retrograde distal access for endovascular interventions in patients with lower limb ischemia. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(6):54–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202106154.
12. Matmuratov KZh, Irnazarov AA, Ruzmetov PYu, Ruzmetov NA. Leg amputations: a differentiated approach to performance depending on thelesion of the arterial basinl. Vestnik Ekstrennoy Meditsiny. 2022;15(5):18–25. (In Russ.) Available at: https://oj.ems-journal.uz/index.php/ems/article/view/212/149.
13. Novikov YuV, Fomin AA, Pershakov DR. A new view on angiosome theory applying microsirculation. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;(1). (In Russ.) Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=18160.
14. Gavrilenko AV, Skrylev SI. Surgical management of patients with lower limb critical ischaemia induced by lesions of infrainguinal arteries. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2008;14(3):111–117. (In Russ.) Available at: https://angiolsurgery.org/en/magazine/2008/3/14.htm.
15. Aronov DM, Bubnova DM, Zykova MG The importance of sulodexide in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Kardiologiya. 1995;35(11):24–29. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/ymmlzt.
16. Borsov MH, Kovalenko VI, Temrezov MB, Shukov RA. Sulodexide in complex treatment of patients with atherothrombotic injury of lower limbs arteries. New Technologies. 2011;(4):217–221. (In Russ.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/oookit
17. Bregovsky VB, Zalesskaya AG. The use of sulodexide in obliterating atherosclerosis of the lower extremities in patients with diabetes mellitus. Problemy Endokrinologii. 1998;44(4):16–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl199844416-18.
18. Gavrilova NA, Tishchenko OE. The impact of sulodexide on the endothelial functional state in patients with diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Mellitus. 2011;14(2):66–68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5637.
19. Morozov AM, Avanesyan AE, Boltik AA, Sergeev AN. Possibilities of sulodexide use in clinical practice. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2023;17(6):289–298. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2022-050.
20. Vaganov AG, Nocturnal MS, Lisitsky DA, Gavrilenko AV. The first experience of hybrid surgery with simultaneous proximal and distal endovascular revascularization in treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. 2024;12(20):110–113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2024-12-2-110-113.
21. Vaganov AG, Nocturnal MS, Lisitsky DA, Gavrilenko AV. First experience of distal hybrid surgery on lower limb arteries with port-system installation. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2024;102(2):133–138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-2-133-138.
22. Hoppensteadt DA, Fareed J. Pharmacological profile of sulodexide. Int Angiol. 2014;33(3):229–235. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24936531.
23. Lauver DA, Lucchesi BR. Sulodexide: a renewed interest in this glycosaminoglycan. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2006;24(3–4):214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3466.2006.00214.x.
24. Coccheri S, Mannello F. Development and use of sulodexide in vascular diseases: implications for treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;8:49–65. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S6762.
25. Harenberg J. Review of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic properties of sulodexide. Med Res Rev. 1998;18(1):1–20. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9436179.
26. Coccheri S, Scondotto G, Agnelli G, Palazzini E, Zamboni V. Sulodexide in the treatment of intermittent claudication. Results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(13):1057–1065. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2001.3033.
27. Gaddi A, Galetti C, Illuminati B, Nascetti S. Meta-analysis of some results of clinical trials on sulodexide therapy in peripheral occlusive arterial disease. J Int Med Res. 1996;24(5):389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/030006059602400501.
28. Shustov SB. Controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of oral sulodexide in patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 1997;13(10):573–582. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007999709113331.
29. Pompilio G, Nicolaides A, Kakkos SK, Integlia D. Systematic literature review and network Meta-analysis of sulodexide and other drugs in chronic venous disease. Phlebology. 2021;36(9):695–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555211015020.
30. Pigarevsky PV, Snegova VA, Nazarov PG. Macrophages and their role in destabilization of an atherosclerotic plaque. Kardiologiya. 2019;59(4):88–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.4.10254.
Review
For citations:
Vaganov A.G., Kuznetsov M.R., Kosenkov A.N., Lisitskiy D.A. Experience in outpatient management of patients after hybrid interventions on the arteries of the lower extremities. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia). 2025;22(1):120-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2025-015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.