Preview

Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)

Advanced search

Modern superabsorbent wound dressing in the treatment of complicated forms of diabetic foot syndrome: Clinical research

https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2026-010

Abstract

Introduction. The number of people with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the world is increasing exponentially, most of them are of working age. Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS)leads to theloss of alimb or part of it in 60% of cases. The effective effect of modern sorbent dressings at different stages of the course of the wound process remains the subject of study, controversy and requires deeper awareness and confirmation.

Aim. To detail the effect of modern superabsorbent dressings on the wound process in patients with complicated diabetic foot syndrome.

Materials and methods. A clinical prospective study was conducted to study changes in: laboratory parameters (urea, creatinine, granulocytes, leukocytes, lymphocytes, MID cells); wound area; reduction of wound area as a percentage; healing rate and microbial landscape of wound defects against the background of superabsorbent wound dressing in thelocal treatment of complicated forms of diabetic foot syndrome. A total of 54 patients were selected for the analysis: the main group consisted of 24 people, aged from 49 to 79 years, the average age was 64 ± 11 years, the proportion of men was 41.6% (10/24); the comparison group consisted of 30 people aged from 54 to 75 years, the average age was 65 ± 9 years, the proportion of men was 33.3% (10/30).

Results. Studies of changes inlaboratory parameters: urea, creatinine, granulocytes,leukocytes,lymphocytes, MID cells showed statistically significant differences in both groups at different stages of treatment, mainly on the 14th and 30th day of treatment (4–5 visits). The dynamics of the wound healing rate, a decrease in the wound area as a percentage, a change in the wound area as a whole, as well as a change in the bacterial contamination of the wound were significantly different already on the 7th day of treatment.

Conclusions. The expediency of using Zetuvit Plus Silicone sorbent dressings was confirmed by a study of the dynamics of changes in laboratory parameters, the quantitative and qualitative microbiallandscape of trophic ulcers against the background of diabetes mellitus, and indicators of soft tissue regeneration processes.

About the Authors

K. A. Koreyba
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Konstantin A. Koreyba, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases, Honored Doctor of the Republic of Tatarstan

49, Butlerov St., Kazan, 420012



P. S. Lukin
Vagner Perm State Medical University
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Lukin, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Clinical and Operative Surgery

26, Petropavlovskaya St., Perm, 614990



S. Yu. Shirnaeva
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Svetlana Y. Shirnaeva, Senior Lecturer of the Department of X-ray Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Expert of Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Biostatistics

89, Chapaevskaya St., Samara, 443099



References

1. Koreyba KA, Lukin PS, Krivoshchekov EP. Absorbent dressings at the outpatient stage of treatment of tissue defects in patients with diabetic foot syndrome. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2025;22(1):140–145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2025-029.

2. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Sukhareva OY, Mokrysheva NG, Andreeva EN, Bezlepkina OB et al. Standards of Specialized Diabetes Care. Diabetes Mellitus. 2025;28(5S):1–175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM20255S.

3. Perez-Favila A, Martinez-Fierro ML, Rodriguez-Lazalde JG, Cid- Baez MA, Zamudio-Osuna MDJ, Martinez-Blanco MDR et al. Current therapeutic strategies in diabetic foot ulcers. Medicina. 2019;55(11):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55110714.

4. Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H, Latenser D, Mozingo D, Mullins F et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-con- taining soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadia- zine cream. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(6):617–626. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318236fe31.

5. Заривчацкий МФ. Синдром диабетической стопы. Пермь: ФГБОУ ВО ПГМУ им. академика Е.А. Вагнера Минздрава России; 2020. 98 с.

6. Lichman LL, Katorkin SE, Andreev PS. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of modern self-adhesive silicone postoperative dressings. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2023;20(2):96–100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-028.

7. Дедов ИИ, Шестакова МВ, Майоров АЮ, Шамхалова МШ, Сухарева ОЮ, Галстян ГР и др. Клинические рекомендации «Сахарный диабет 2 типа у взрослых». 2022. Режим доступа: https://rgp4.ru/wp-content/uploads/Клинические-рекомендации-сахарный-диабет-2-типа-у-взрослых.pdf.

8. Krivoshchekov EP. Experience of using chitosan and carboxymethylcellulose in the early postoperative period in patients with diabetic foot syndrome complications. Al’manakh Instituta Khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo. 2020;(2):845–846. (In Russ.)

9. Amin N, Doupis J. Diabetic foot disease: From the evaluation of the “foot at risk” to the novel diabetic ulcer treatment modalities. World J Diabetes. 2016;7(7):153–164. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v7.i7.153.

10. Бенсман ВМ. Хирургия гнойно-некротических осложнений диабетической стопы. Руководство для врачей. М.: Медпрактика; 2015. 495 с. Режим доступа: https://expo-books.ru/category/book?id=9156.

11. Pendsey SP. Understanding diabetic foot. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2010;30(2):75–79. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-3930.62596.

12. Krivoshchekov EP, Alyapyshev GS, Poseryaev AV, Elshin EP. Bioplastic material for chronic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ": Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health. 2020;(3):85–91. (In Russ.) Available at: https://vestnik.reaviz.ru/jour/article/view/60?locale=ru_RU.

13. Ступин ВА. Синдром диабетической стопы. Эпидемиология, патофизиология, диагностика и лечение. М.: Литтерра; 2019. 200 с.

14. Kheng DE. Evaluation of Mepilex Ag, a silver impregnated soft silicone absorbent dressing in patients with critically colonized venous leg ulcers – 5 case reviews. Poster presentation at the 3rd Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies, Toronto, Canada, 2008.

15. Shi J, Barakat M, Chen D, Chen L. Bicellular tight junctions and wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123862.

16. Atkin L, Barrett S, Chadwick P, Callaghan R, Rippon MG, Rogers AA, Simm S. Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series. J Wound Care. 2020;29(3):174–182. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.3.174.

17. Tickle J. Introducing a new superabsorbent dressing to manage wound exudate. Br J Nurs. 2017;26(Suppl. 20):S38–S45. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.Sup20.S38.

18. Kurlaev PP, Gritsenko VA, Belozertseva YuP. Antibacterial therapy of purulent-necrotic complications of diabetic foot syndrome. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin "Man and His Health". 2018;(4):80–87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2018-4/13.

19. Wiegand C, Hipler UC, Elsner P, Tittelbach J. Clinical efficacy of dressings for treatment of heavily exuding chronic wounds. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2015;2015(2):101–111. https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S60315.

20. Holloway S. Skin considerations for older adults with wounds. Br J Community Nurs. 2019;24(Suppl. 6):S15–S19. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.Sup6.S15.


Review

For citations:


Koreyba K.A., Lukin P.S., Shirnaeva S.Yu. Modern superabsorbent wound dressing in the treatment of complicated forms of diabetic foot syndrome: Clinical research. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia). 2026;23(1):79-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2026-010

Views: 227

JATS XML

ISSN 2712-8741 (Print)
ISSN 2782-2591 (Online)