Sodium picosulfate in the clinical practice of a surgeon
https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-016
Abstract
Picosulfate, a diphenylmethane derivative, belongs to a group of drugs called stimulant laxatives. It is widely used in surgery to treat various colon evacuation disorders due to its effectiveness, safety of use and ease of dosage selection, as well as the option to combine with other laxatives. It is administered much more frequently for colorectal cancer screening, when the colon is prepared using sodium picosulfate combined with other osmotic laxatives, most often polyethylene glycol, which allows to use smaller volumes of solution. According to the literature, this method for cleaning the colon is used most often, which is associated with better adherence of patients to the intake of small volumes of liquid, as shown by our observations. The article highlights the literature data, and the authors also present their own experience – a clinical case report of the treatment of a 30-year-old patient diagnosed with grade I external and internal hemorrhoids. Laser ablation of internal and excision of external hemorrhoids was performed under local anesthesia. Regulax® Picosulfate was included in the therapy in the postoperative period, along with topical and pain relief drugs. As a result, the patient had a comfortable, not very painful bowel movement on the following day after the surgery. The laxative was used to manage stool for a week. In conclusion, the authors draw attention to the fact that increased patient compliance in preparing the colon for examination leads to better cleaning and more informative results during colonoscopy. Therefore, Regulax® Picosulfate combined with other laxatives to prepare a patient for examination, in particular colorectal cancer screening, where it is used most often, applies to a huge number of patients, so the problem of further study of its use is socially significant.
About the Authors
I. A. MatveevRussian Federation
Ivan A. Matveev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery; Coloproctologist
54, Odesskaya St., Tyumen, 625023;
55, Kotovskogo St., Tyumen, 625023
S. V. Lipovoy
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Lipovoy, Head of the Department of Purulent Surgery
55, Kotovskogo St., Tyumen, 625023
M. P. Kozlov
Russian Federation
Mikhail P. Kozlov, Endoscopist, Endoscopy Department
55, Kotovskogo St., Tyumen, 625023
N. N. Povarnin
Russian Federation
Nikolay N. Povarnin, Coloproctologist
36/1b, Vodoprovodnaya St., Tyumen, 625000
References
1. Lazebnik LB, Turkina SV, Golovanova EV, Ardatskaya MD, Ostroumova OD, Komissarenko IA et al. Constipation in adults. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;(3):10–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-175-3-10-33.
2. Enck P, Leinert J, Smid M, Köhler T, Schwille-Kiuntke J. Prevalence of constipation in the German population – a representative survey (GECCO). United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(3):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640615603009.
3. Dudi-Venkata NN, Kroon HM, Bedrikovetski S, Moore JW, Thomas ML, Sammour T. A global survey of surgeons’ preferences and practice with regard to laxative use after elective colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(4):759–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03521-1.
4. Buscail E, Deraison C. Postoperative ileus: A pharmacological perspective. Br J Pharmacol. 2022;179(13):3283–3305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15800.
5. Sommer NP, Schneider R, Wehner S, Kalff JC, Vilz TO. State-of-the-art colorectal disease: postoperative ileus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36(9):2017–2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03939-1.
6. Khomyakov EA, Rybakov EG. Postoperative paresis of the gastrointestinal tract. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2017;(3):76–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2017376-85.
7. Fomin VS. Postoperative adynamic ileus: prevention and treatment. Farmateka. 2018;(7):97–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2018.7.97-101.
8. Tontini GE, Prada A, Sferrazza S, Ciprandi G, Vecchi M. The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation. JGH Open. 2021;5(10):1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12653.
9. Spadaccini M, Frazzoni L, Vanella G, East J, Radaelli F, Spada C et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of High- vs Low-Volume Split-Dose Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(7):1454–1465.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.044.
10. Zhang J, Jia X, Guo Y, Jiang H, Hu J, Wang S et al. Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial. Precis Clin Med. 2022;5(2):pbac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbac009.
11. Ali IA, Roton D, Madhoun M. Oral sulfate solution versus low-volume polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Endosc. 2022;34(4):721–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14194.
12. Nam SJ, Park SC, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Kim JH, Bang CS, Seo HI. Randomized trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for bowel cleansing in elderly people. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;37(2):319–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15696.
13. Müller-Lissner S. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the current chronic constipation treatments. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013;9(4):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2013.773972.
14. Skvortsov VV, Eremenko AA, Eremenko NV. Regulation of a delicate problem in patients with rectal diseases. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2022;19(1):81–88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-1-81-88.
15. Bharucha AE, Lacy BE. Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Management of Chronic Constipation. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1232–1249.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034.
16. Jin Z, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Gong B. Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(5):523–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2013-5.
17. Kienzle-Horn S, Vix JM, Schuijt C, Peil H, Jordan CC, Kamm MA. Comparison of bisacodyl and sodium picosulphate in the treatment of chronic constipation. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(4):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079907x178865.
18. Plotnikova EYu, Zolotukhina VN, Gracheva TYu. Place of stimulating laxatives in therapy of constipations. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2016;(17):100–105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2016-17-100-105.
19. Chang L, Chey WD, Imdad A, Almario CV, Bharucha AE, Diem S et al. American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(7):1086–1106. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.214.
20. Drozdov VN, Karnoukh KI, Serebrova SYu, Komissarenko IA, Starodubtsev AK. Possibilities of sodium picosulfate application in constipation pharmacotherapy in functional intestinal disorders. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2019;(3):92–97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-3-92-97.
21. Matveev IA, Gibert BK, Matveev AI, Kozlov MP. Tolerance to Colonoscopy Preparation with Fortrans and Predictors of Negative Effects. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2021;20(1):83–89. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2021-1-83-89.
22. Gibert BK, Matveev IA, Makhnev AV, Matveev AI, Kozlov MP, Povarnin NN. Quality Audit of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Protocols in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Koloproktologia. 2022;21(3):20–26. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-20-26.
23. Shulpekova YuO. Algorithm for the treatment of constipation of various origins. RMJ. 2007;(15):1165–1172. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/gastroenterologiya/Algoritm_lecheniya_zapora_razlichnogo_proishoghdeniya/.
24. Shulpekova YuO, Rusyaev VYu, Sheptulin DA, Shulpekova NV. Intestine motility, secretion, and constipation treatment principles. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2020;(15):113–119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-15-113-119.
25. Belous SS, Abritsova MV, Torchua NR, Bogdanova EM. The use of sodium thiosulfate in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2023;20(1):133–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-006.
26. Belik BM, Kovalev AN. Modern approach to the choice of laxative agent in surgical interventions in outpatient coloproctology. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2022;19(2):96–105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-2-96-105.
27. Wilhelm W, Vassiliadis N, Röhrig S, Eberhart LH, Görtz G. Optimierung des perioperativen Managements am Beispiel der laparoskopischen Leistenbruchoperation. Anaesthesist. 2008;57(9):915–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-008-1402-2.
28. Skazyvaeva EV, Lapinsky IV, Pushkina AV, Avalueva EB, Tkachenko EI, Medvedeva OI. Improving effectiveness of patients’ preparation to colonoscopy using combined scheme based on macrogol. Medical Alphabet. 2016;(5):10–14. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/xuxyyf.
29. Shcherbakov PL, Parfenov AI, Albulova EV. New schemes of preparation of the intestine for colonoscopy. Lechaschi Vrach. 2014;(11):75–80. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.lvrach.ru/2014/11/15436101.
30. Katz PO, Rex DK, Epstein M, Grandhi NK, Vanner S, Hookey LC et al. A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(3):401–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.441.
31. Phatak UP, Johnson S, Husain SZ, Pashankar DS. Two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350 and bisacodyl: a new, safe, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53(1):71–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e318210807a.
32. Lamanna A, Dughetti LD, Jordan-Ely JA, Dobson KM, Dynan M, Foo A et al. Treatment of fecal impaction in children using combined polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate. JGH Open. 2018;2(4):144–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12062.
33. Jordan-Ely J, Hutson JM, Southwell BR. Disimpaction of children with severe constipation in 3–4 days in a suburban clinic using polyethylene glycol with electrolytes and sodium picosulphate. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51(12):1195–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12939.
34. Hoy SM, Scott LJ, Wagstaff AJ. Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser. Drugs. 2009;69(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969010-00009.
35. Mueller-Lissner S, Kamm MA, Wald A, Hinkel U, Koehler U, Richter E, Bubeck J. Multicenter, 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled trial of sodium picosulfate in patients with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.41.
36. Luthra P, Camilleri M, Burr NE, Quigley EMM, Black CJ, Ford AC. Efficacy of drugs in chronic idiopathic constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(11):831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30246-8.
37. Degovtsov EN, Trukhan DI, Nikonenko VA, Kosenok VK. Patient with constipation syndrome at the ambulatory-polyclinic reception: actual aspects of diagnosis and treatment. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2020;(1-2):46–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2020-1-2-46-56.
38. De Miranda Neto AA, de Moura DTH, Hathorn KE, Tustumi F, de Moura EGH, Ribeiro IB. Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Split-Dose Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Oral Solution Compared to the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Solution for Bowel Preparation in Outpatient Colonoscopy: An Evidence-Based Review. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020;13:449–457. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S237649.
39. Van Dongen M. Enhancing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: an integrative review. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012;35(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182403413.
40. Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(6):28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4.
41. Pantaleón Sánchez M, Gimeno Garcia AZ, Bernad Cabredo B, García-Rodríguez A, Frago S, Nogales O et al. Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2022;34(6):1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14278.
42. Kluge MA, Williams JL, Wu CK, Jacobson BC, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Calderwood AH. Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(3):744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012.
43. Di Leo M, Iannone A, Arena M, Losurdo G, Palamara MA, Iabichino G et al. Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(45):7748–7770. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7748.
Review
For citations:
Matveev I.A., Lipovoy S.V., Kozlov M.P., Povarnin N.N. Sodium picosulfate in the clinical practice of a surgeon. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia). 2023;20(2):135-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-016

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.