Prevention of relapses of varicose veins in patients with true doubling of the great saphenous vein

Introduction. True doubling of great saphenous vein is observed in 1.6–2.1% of patients with varicose veins and may be one of the reasons for the development of postoperative relapse of the disease. Performing endovasal laser coagulation (EVLC) of both great saphenous vein trunks makes it possible to increase the radicality of the intervention and reduce the likelihood of a recurrence of varicose veins.

Aim. Based on the study of immediate and long-term results, to substantiate the expediency of using EVLC of the main and true additional stem of great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins.

Materials and methods. From 2014 to 2020, 24 patients with a true doubling of great saphenous vein were treated. Among the applicants there were 12 women and 12 men aged 23 to 62 years with clinical class C2–C4 according to the CEAP (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic) classification. All patients under tumescent anesthesia underwent simultaneous EVLC of the main and accessory trunk of the BPV, followed by miniflebectomy or sclerobliteration of varicose tributaries.

Results and discussion. The use of simultaneous coagulation of both trunks was performed by all patients, thus the technical success of the operation was observed in 100% of cases. There were no intraoperative complications. The use of such a volume of intervention is accompanied by an increase in the duration of the operation by 29.3%. Hyperpigmentation in the projection of the coagulated trunk was observed in 2 (8.3%) patients, neurological disorders – in 1 (4.2%) patient. During the examination of patients 1–2 years after the operation, no relapses of the disease were detected, and the cosmetic result of the intervention on a ten-point scale, patients on average estimated at 7.6 points.

Conclusions. True doubling of the great saphenous vein is rare and may increase the likelihood of relapses of the disease. EVLC of the main and additional BPV trunks is accompanied by an increase in the duration of surgery by an average of 29.3%, and the number of patients with hyperpigmentation by 1.5 times. Simultaneous EVLC of both tables with true duplication of BPV makes it possible to reliably block a potential source of varicose disease recurrence and reduce the likelihood of recurrent veins.

1. Sadriev O.N., Kalmykov E.L., Gaibov A.D., Inoyatov M.S. Recurrent varices after surgery. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2016;(1):86–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17816/PAVLOVJ2016186-90.

2. Smirnov A.A., Kulikov L.K., Privalov Yu.A., Sobotovich V.F. Relapses of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Novosti Khirurgii. 2015;(4):447–451. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elib.vsmu.by/bitstream/123/4475/1/nkh_2015_4_447-451.pdf?ysclid=l96t6gu5e7911153293.

3. Soliev O.F., Sultanov D.D., Kurbanov S.P., Kurbanov N.R., Khvan I.N., Amonov Sh.Sh. Significant аspects of epidemiology, risk factors and treatment of varicose veins. Avicenna Bulletin. 2020;(2):320–328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2020-22-2-320-328.

4. Volkov A.S., Dibirov M.D., Shimanko A.I., Gadzhimuradov R.U., Tsuranov S.V., Shvydko V.S. et al. Comparison of Endovasal Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein in the Complex Treatment of Lower Limb Varicose Vein Disease. Flebologiya. 2020;(2):91–98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20201402191.

5. Pelevin A.V., Guzhkov O.N., Mushnikov D.L. Ways to improve outpatient phlebological care with “one day” technology. Ambulatornaya Khirurgiya. 2021;(1):30–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2021-18-1-30-39.

6. Ignatovich I.N., Kondratenko G.G., Novikova N.M., Ignatovich E.I. Preservation or Obliteration of Great Saphenous Vein in Varicose Veins: Long- Term Follow-up Data of Single- Center Study. Flebologiya. 2020;(1):19–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20201401119.

7. Raskin V.V., Semenov A.Yu., Kurginyan Kh.M. Endovenous laser obliteration in the prevention of recurrence of varicose veins in the anterior saphenous vein pool. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2020;(3):98–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20202303198.

8. Chernookov A., Ramishvili V., Dolgov S., Nikolaev A., Atayan A., Belykh E. Actual strategy of treatment varicose veins recurrence after endovenous interventions. Georgian Medical News. 2021;(4):26–33. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.geomednews.com/Articles/2021/4_2021/26-33.pdf.

9. Gaibov A.D., Nematzoda O., Burieva Sh.M., Kalmykov E.L. Experience of application of mechanochemical scleroobliteration in treatment for recurrence of lower extremity varicose vein disease I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2020;(1):57–66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23888/PAVLOVJ202028157-66.

10. Darvall K.A.L., Bate G.R., Adam D.J., Silverman S.H., Bradbury A.W. Duplex ultrasound outcomes following ultrasound- guided foam sclerotherapy of symptomatic recurrent great saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(1):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.010.

11. Pavei P., Ferrini M., Spreafico G., Nosadini А., Piccioli A., Giraldi E., Baccaglini U. Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy of recurrent varices of the great and small saphenous vein: 5-year follow up. Veins and Lymphatics. 2014;3:46–55. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ultrasound-guided-foam-sclerotherapy-of-recurrent-Pavei-Ferrini/7ecbb1ba3f5c990c0f239647c3c6c8209ca196d6.

12. Park H.S., Kwon Y., Eom B.W., Lee T. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of quality of life and recurrence between high ligation and stripping and radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.48.

13. Kaplunova O.A., Shvyrev A.A., Shulgin A.I. Clinical anatomy of veins of the lower limbs. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2011;(1):10–17. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.medicalherald.ru/jour/article/view/1171.

14. Kockaert M., De Roos K.P., Van Dijk L., Nijsten T., Neumann M. Duplication of the great saphenous vein: a definition problem and implications for therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02154.x.

15. Kumar N., Aithal A.P., Swamy R.S., Nayak S.B., Rao M.K.G., Abhinitha P. Bifurcated great saphenous vein: a report on its therapeutic and diagnostic perspectives. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2017;27(3):107–109. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_7_17.

16. Padavinangadi A., Kumar N., Swamy R.S., Satheesha N.B. Unilateral double great saphenous varicose vein: a clinically significant case report. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2015;25(4):116–118. https://doi.org/10.4103/2211-4122.172491.

17. Corrales N.E., McGuinnnes C.L., Dourado R., Burnand K.G. Incedence and pattern long saphenous vein duplication and its possible implications for recurrence after varicose vein surgery. Br J Surg. 2002;89(3):323–326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.00071323.2001.02033.x.

18. Waseem A.T., Roger S. A duplicated great saphenous vein and clinical significance for varicosity. Rev Arg De Anat Clin. 2014;6(1):43–46.